Tweet
How Germany banned the use of computer totals to determine the winners of elections in 2009—and how the United States failed to do the same. Shame on us.
Jon Christian Ryter's Conservative World / Plain Talk
Jon Christian Ryter
8/11/2016
Excerpt:
In 2009 a German father and son team, political scientist Joachim Wiesner and his son Ulrich Wiesner, a physicist, filed suit in the German Federal Constitutional Court (the equivalent to our US Supreme Court) to ban the use electronic voting machines which tabulate the votes and determine the winners and losers. The father and son plaintiffs argued before the German high court that voting machines are open to massive vote fraud, producing votes from non-existent voters as well camouflaging non-eligible voters who were not citizens of Germany. The Wiesners showed the court how the source codes can be manipulated to produce massive vote fraud, Constitutional judge Andreas Vosskuhle ruled that while the plaintiffs did not produce specific evidence that vote fraud had occurred in the 2005 election which was contested, Vosskuhle agreed that when the source code in the electronic voting machine tabulates the votes, there was no transparency which allows the voter to see what actually happens to his vote inside the computer. Five Germanic states cast their ballots by electronic voting machines in 2005. The electronic voting machines used in that election were the ESD1 and ESD2 from the Dutch electronics firm NEDAP (Nederlandsche Apparanfen).
(See the attached link showing that voting machines which have created between 32 and 36 million fraudulent votes for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 stole the elections constitutionally won in 2008 by Sen. John McCain and in 2012 from former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.) The German high court agreed with the plaintiffs and banned the use of computers to count the ballots in Germany's federal elections. Votes cast were tabulated by hand counting the ballots in front of poll watchers to prevent massive vote theft by the computer creating votes which were never cast.
In Germany, as well as in the other nation-states in Europe, the political views of the citizen populations are becoming increasingly nationalistic unlike the views of the ruling socialist elites which, as is the case worldwide, are bribed into submission by the princes of industry.who, when world government is achieved, will hold the sixth—and primary—seat in the UN Security Council (which was an occupied seat prior to 1966). They will be the key decision-making apparatus in the governing body of the world because they, not the politicians, will control the financial infrastructure of the world. There will no longer be a favored segment in the working class. Black lives will no longer matter more than White lives, Brown lives, blue lives or paisley print lives because once the elites have disarmed the law abiding citizens of the world, they will no longer tolerate civil disobedience of any type (which included destroying the property of the courtesans of commerce) from anyone—especially those whose protests are sanctioned today by the utopians who need civil unrest, and lots of it, to justify suspending the Constitution and declaring martial law in the United States. But the first step is blaming gun violence on law abiding people. Once they are disarmed, they are at the mercy of a government in disarray but determined to become a global dictatorship.
Which is why the citizens of the European Union population centers now oppose the political direction of the non-political taskmasters of the EU who own the "representative governments" of the EU states through their ability to bribe them into submission. Today, the princes of industry, the barons of banking and courtesans of commerce now control the economic direction of Europe by fraudulently manipulating the political direction of the nation states and the EU to enact the legislation the taskmasters of global governance need to fortify their personal wealth and to effectively control both the people and their national parliaments.
A horrendous gap between the number of registered voters who voted in the Election of 2008 and the number of votes counted was revealed in November, 2009 thanks to the careless posting of the data on the White House website by White House personnel as a dig against California attorney Orley Taitz's Quo Warrento lawsuit. A similar discrepancy between the number of registered voters who voted and the number of votes counted happened again in the Election of 2012. In 2013 some 34 States crafted, and in most cases, enacted, "Voter Photo ID" laws which require photo IDs to prove voter eligibility in order to enter into the voting booth on Election Day in those States. The ACLU and other leftwing advocacy groups who know, because the Democratic Party has drifted far beyond any American concept of liberty or freedom in favor of communist socialism, they can no longer win in an honest election.
When honest-vote advocate and a Democrat Washington State grandmother, Beverly Harris, inadvertently stumbled on computerized vote fraud, she was convinced the theft was perpetuated by Republicans because...well, she was an honest Democrat who belonged to the party which wore the brand of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Andrew Jackson so it had to be the guys on the other side.Hack-DemocracySadly, the patriotic names of America's Founding Fathers and the hero of the Battle of New Orleans in 1812 have been replaced with the name of Karl Marx.
Everything I've learned about Beverly Harris tells me she is an honest broker advocating for honest elections. She is the first honest election advocate who has unequivocally proven that any electronic voting machine in the country can be hacked in 90 seconds or less in order to manipulate the votes cast in that voting machine—without leaving any trace that the machine, or the entire voting system, had been hacked. Like most Americans, Harris began her search for answers on Google. Since she was looking for vote fraud in California after members of the California Task Force on Electronic Voting told her they asked ES&S (which California was using) how the voting machines were programmed. ES&S refused to answer. Harris decided to find out for herself. She went to Google and entered "@essvote.com" in the Google search, hoping to pull up emails to or from ES&S executives whom she could query for the answers to the questions they wouldn't divulge to members of the e.vote task force. She found a few email addresses, but didn't want to alert ES&S that she was investigating them until she learned enough to be able to ask pertinent questions which didn't give ES&S enough wiggle room to escape. She then entered "global election systems" and tried again. On the 15th page of that search Harris found some old documents which included a file ending with .gesn.com. From there, she found an archive page for GESN.com and with it, a FTP transmission portal which was likely used to transmit extremely large computer files from point A to point B. Harris and her cybergeek colleague realized that what they had, once they opened the FTP site, was a super cache of top secret vote data parked on an unprotected file transfer site on the Internet. There were 40,000 files in that site which took Harris from ES&S to Diebold, Inc.
Somehow Harris was able to upload all of the software from the gesn.com FTP site, including all of the source code from the program which was parked unattended and not password protected. She was able to upload the source code program onto her own computer over several hours. Reading the source code, on the other hand, proved to be a different matter. She called her cybergeek friend who was able to translate it for her over a period of weeks. What she and her company, Black Box Voting.org. discovered was that the source code, which theoretically was supposed to made it impossible for anyone to hack a Diebold (or ES&S) source code program, was just so much cyber-hype. The cybergeek Harris used to translate the Diebold hard drive discovered an application in the Diebold program called GEMS which rewrote the code on how the votes cast are counted.
The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimal vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
...............................................
View the complete article, including video and links, at:
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Plain_Talk/160811.html
Jon Christian Ryter's Conservative World / Plain Talk
Jon Christian Ryter
8/11/2016
Excerpt:
In 2009 a German father and son team, political scientist Joachim Wiesner and his son Ulrich Wiesner, a physicist, filed suit in the German Federal Constitutional Court (the equivalent to our US Supreme Court) to ban the use electronic voting machines which tabulate the votes and determine the winners and losers. The father and son plaintiffs argued before the German high court that voting machines are open to massive vote fraud, producing votes from non-existent voters as well camouflaging non-eligible voters who were not citizens of Germany. The Wiesners showed the court how the source codes can be manipulated to produce massive vote fraud, Constitutional judge Andreas Vosskuhle ruled that while the plaintiffs did not produce specific evidence that vote fraud had occurred in the 2005 election which was contested, Vosskuhle agreed that when the source code in the electronic voting machine tabulates the votes, there was no transparency which allows the voter to see what actually happens to his vote inside the computer. Five Germanic states cast their ballots by electronic voting machines in 2005. The electronic voting machines used in that election were the ESD1 and ESD2 from the Dutch electronics firm NEDAP (Nederlandsche Apparanfen).
(See the attached link showing that voting machines which have created between 32 and 36 million fraudulent votes for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 stole the elections constitutionally won in 2008 by Sen. John McCain and in 2012 from former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.) The German high court agreed with the plaintiffs and banned the use of computers to count the ballots in Germany's federal elections. Votes cast were tabulated by hand counting the ballots in front of poll watchers to prevent massive vote theft by the computer creating votes which were never cast.
In Germany, as well as in the other nation-states in Europe, the political views of the citizen populations are becoming increasingly nationalistic unlike the views of the ruling socialist elites which, as is the case worldwide, are bribed into submission by the princes of industry.who, when world government is achieved, will hold the sixth—and primary—seat in the UN Security Council (which was an occupied seat prior to 1966). They will be the key decision-making apparatus in the governing body of the world because they, not the politicians, will control the financial infrastructure of the world. There will no longer be a favored segment in the working class. Black lives will no longer matter more than White lives, Brown lives, blue lives or paisley print lives because once the elites have disarmed the law abiding citizens of the world, they will no longer tolerate civil disobedience of any type (which included destroying the property of the courtesans of commerce) from anyone—especially those whose protests are sanctioned today by the utopians who need civil unrest, and lots of it, to justify suspending the Constitution and declaring martial law in the United States. But the first step is blaming gun violence on law abiding people. Once they are disarmed, they are at the mercy of a government in disarray but determined to become a global dictatorship.
Which is why the citizens of the European Union population centers now oppose the political direction of the non-political taskmasters of the EU who own the "representative governments" of the EU states through their ability to bribe them into submission. Today, the princes of industry, the barons of banking and courtesans of commerce now control the economic direction of Europe by fraudulently manipulating the political direction of the nation states and the EU to enact the legislation the taskmasters of global governance need to fortify their personal wealth and to effectively control both the people and their national parliaments.
A horrendous gap between the number of registered voters who voted in the Election of 2008 and the number of votes counted was revealed in November, 2009 thanks to the careless posting of the data on the White House website by White House personnel as a dig against California attorney Orley Taitz's Quo Warrento lawsuit. A similar discrepancy between the number of registered voters who voted and the number of votes counted happened again in the Election of 2012. In 2013 some 34 States crafted, and in most cases, enacted, "Voter Photo ID" laws which require photo IDs to prove voter eligibility in order to enter into the voting booth on Election Day in those States. The ACLU and other leftwing advocacy groups who know, because the Democratic Party has drifted far beyond any American concept of liberty or freedom in favor of communist socialism, they can no longer win in an honest election.
When honest-vote advocate and a Democrat Washington State grandmother, Beverly Harris, inadvertently stumbled on computerized vote fraud, she was convinced the theft was perpetuated by Republicans because...well, she was an honest Democrat who belonged to the party which wore the brand of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and Andrew Jackson so it had to be the guys on the other side.Hack-DemocracySadly, the patriotic names of America's Founding Fathers and the hero of the Battle of New Orleans in 1812 have been replaced with the name of Karl Marx.
Everything I've learned about Beverly Harris tells me she is an honest broker advocating for honest elections. She is the first honest election advocate who has unequivocally proven that any electronic voting machine in the country can be hacked in 90 seconds or less in order to manipulate the votes cast in that voting machine—without leaving any trace that the machine, or the entire voting system, had been hacked. Like most Americans, Harris began her search for answers on Google. Since she was looking for vote fraud in California after members of the California Task Force on Electronic Voting told her they asked ES&S (which California was using) how the voting machines were programmed. ES&S refused to answer. Harris decided to find out for herself. She went to Google and entered "@essvote.com" in the Google search, hoping to pull up emails to or from ES&S executives whom she could query for the answers to the questions they wouldn't divulge to members of the e.vote task force. She found a few email addresses, but didn't want to alert ES&S that she was investigating them until she learned enough to be able to ask pertinent questions which didn't give ES&S enough wiggle room to escape. She then entered "global election systems" and tried again. On the 15th page of that search Harris found some old documents which included a file ending with .gesn.com. From there, she found an archive page for GESN.com and with it, a FTP transmission portal which was likely used to transmit extremely large computer files from point A to point B. Harris and her cybergeek colleague realized that what they had, once they opened the FTP site, was a super cache of top secret vote data parked on an unprotected file transfer site on the Internet. There were 40,000 files in that site which took Harris from ES&S to Diebold, Inc.
Somehow Harris was able to upload all of the software from the gesn.com FTP site, including all of the source code from the program which was parked unattended and not password protected. She was able to upload the source code program onto her own computer over several hours. Reading the source code, on the other hand, proved to be a different matter. She called her cybergeek friend who was able to translate it for her over a period of weeks. What she and her company, Black Box Voting.org. discovered was that the source code, which theoretically was supposed to made it impossible for anyone to hack a Diebold (or ES&S) source code program, was just so much cyber-hype. The cybergeek Harris used to translate the Diebold hard drive discovered an application in the Diebold program called GEMS which rewrote the code on how the votes cast are counted.
The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimal vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
...............................................
View the complete article, including video and links, at:
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Plain_Talk/160811.html