Why the darling of the Dem party, Bill Clinton, was bad for America
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
9/3/2012
Excerpt:
"Clinton is scheduled to star at the Democratic party convention. He is heralded as the best thing since the baked bread, or apple pie, but is he really?
First and foremost, Clinton and Obama are the only 2 Presidents, who never served in the U.S. military of National Guard. When U.S. soldiers were fighting communists in Vietnam, Clinton was protesting against the U.S. in England and meeting with the communist leaders in Europe.
From the point of view of his military service, the only difference between him and Obama, is that his selective service certificate is not forged, at least not to my knowledge.
Clinton was the President who signed WTO-GATT into law. This is probably the single piece of legislation that caused the biggest destruction to the U.S. economy, but it simply took time to see the devastating results of this law.
Here is an example. Recently I saw in my office a patient. For new readers of this blog, who do not know, aside from being a licensed attorney, I am also licensed as a doctor of Dental Surgery. This patient told me that she was a mid level manager at a toy factory. She told me that the corporation that owned the factory closed the U.S. facility, fired all of the American workers and moved manufacturing to China. She, as a manger, was sent to work in China and train the local employees and managers.
She told me that people there were working long hours, 10 hour days, sometimes, during crunch time even longer. She told me that one of her co-workers, who had a somewhat better paying job, than others, once showed her the paycheck, she got. It was about $100 per month. Others got less than that. After this American manager trained the local managers, she was fired as well. She was no longer needed. She is now unemployed, and she is in her 50s. These are the delayed results of Clinton’s anti-American policies. The reason we did not see it right away, is because it took a number of years to build the infrastructure in China, train the employees, build the distribution channels, but today we vividly see the destruction to the U.S. economy caused by Clinton and by the members of the Congress, who were equally corrupt.
When Clinton took office, he said that there should be a better equality in the World. What people did not understand, is that this equality is not achieved by raising the standard of living in the third world countries. It is achieved by lowering our standard of living.
Why the standards of living in the third world countries are not going up so much. The answer is simple: countries that are the biggest threat, are communist or socialist regimes, such as China or Brazil. The wages can be kept low by the regime. You can have free trade with free countries, but these countries and their people are not free."
...........................................
View the complete post at:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=273243
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
9/3/2012
Excerpt:
"Clinton is scheduled to star at the Democratic party convention. He is heralded as the best thing since the baked bread, or apple pie, but is he really?
First and foremost, Clinton and Obama are the only 2 Presidents, who never served in the U.S. military of National Guard. When U.S. soldiers were fighting communists in Vietnam, Clinton was protesting against the U.S. in England and meeting with the communist leaders in Europe.
From the point of view of his military service, the only difference between him and Obama, is that his selective service certificate is not forged, at least not to my knowledge.
Clinton was the President who signed WTO-GATT into law. This is probably the single piece of legislation that caused the biggest destruction to the U.S. economy, but it simply took time to see the devastating results of this law.
Here is an example. Recently I saw in my office a patient. For new readers of this blog, who do not know, aside from being a licensed attorney, I am also licensed as a doctor of Dental Surgery. This patient told me that she was a mid level manager at a toy factory. She told me that the corporation that owned the factory closed the U.S. facility, fired all of the American workers and moved manufacturing to China. She, as a manger, was sent to work in China and train the local employees and managers.
She told me that people there were working long hours, 10 hour days, sometimes, during crunch time even longer. She told me that one of her co-workers, who had a somewhat better paying job, than others, once showed her the paycheck, she got. It was about $100 per month. Others got less than that. After this American manager trained the local managers, she was fired as well. She was no longer needed. She is now unemployed, and she is in her 50s. These are the delayed results of Clinton’s anti-American policies. The reason we did not see it right away, is because it took a number of years to build the infrastructure in China, train the employees, build the distribution channels, but today we vividly see the destruction to the U.S. economy caused by Clinton and by the members of the Congress, who were equally corrupt.
When Clinton took office, he said that there should be a better equality in the World. What people did not understand, is that this equality is not achieved by raising the standard of living in the third world countries. It is achieved by lowering our standard of living.
Why the standards of living in the third world countries are not going up so much. The answer is simple: countries that are the biggest threat, are communist or socialist regimes, such as China or Brazil. The wages can be kept low by the regime. You can have free trade with free countries, but these countries and their people are not free."
...........................................
View the complete post at:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=273243
Comment