Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judge Orders Taitz: Stop Seeking Legal Advice From Court: Congress Rejects Subpoenas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judge Orders Taitz: Stop Seeking Legal Advice From Court: Congress Rejects Subpoenas

    Judge Orders Taitz To Stop Seeking Legal Advice From Court: Congress Rejects Subpoenas

    Birther Report

    3/20/2013

    Excerpt:

    Grinols v Electoral College: Judge England Orders Taitz To Stop Seeking Legal Advice From Court; Congress Rejects Subpoenas
    ( Hat tip Cold Case Posse Supporter @ Free Republic )


    Plaintiffs’ counsel has called and e-mailed chambers staff several times seeking legal advice or to ask questions about how to proceed with their suit. This communication is inappropriate. The Court directs Plaintiffs’ counsel to both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Eastern District of California’s Local Rules. Both sets of rules explain how parties should interact with the Court and how to litigate their lawsuit. Both sets of rules are available online. In the future, Plaintiffs’ counsel should consult both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Eastern District’s Local Rules before proceeding. Local Rules 200 – 305 apply to civil cases, like the one at hand. Local Rule 230 specifically deals with civil motions. In the future, Plaintiffs must comply with this rule.

    If Plaintiffs’ counsel wants to request something from the Court, she must file a noticed motion, which means she must file “a notice of motion, motion, accompanying briefs, affidavits, if appropriate, and copies of all documentary evidence that the moving party intends to submit in support of the motion.” E.D. Cal. Local R. 230(b). [...] - Continued below...

    Grinols v Electoral College - Deputy General Counsel of the US Congress Answer To Subpoenas - 3/15/2013:

    The subpoenas to the Members are invalid for at least the following reasons:

    The subpoenas purport to require answers to certain interrogatories, but that is not a proper function of a subpoena. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(l)(e)(iii) ("Every subpoena must: . . . command each person to whom it is directed to do the following at a specified time and place: attend and testify; produce designated documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things in that person's possession, custody, or control; or permit the inspection of premises . . . ." (emphasis added)).

    The subpoenas each were issued from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California yet improperly purport to require production of interrogatory responses to an address within a different district. See Fed. R. Civ. P. a5@)(2)(C) ("A subpoena must issue as follows: . . . for production . . ., if separate from a subpoena commanding a person's attendance, from the court for the district where the production . . . is to be made."); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(e) ("A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to . . . produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii) [a circumstance that pertains to many, if not all, of the Members]." (emphasis added)). [...] - Continued below...

    FULL ORDER CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/131489946

    FULL ANSWER CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/131491698

    View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...p-seeking.html
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Judge Orders Orly Taitz To Know How To Be A Attorney', which was started 3/20/2013 by 'Cold Case Posse Supporter'

    The thread references court documents - http://ia601604.us.archive.org/23/it...48085.98.0.pdf

    View the complete Free Republic thread at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2998801/posts

    Excerpt:

    Plaintiffs’ counsel has called and e-mailed chambers staff several times seeking legal advice or to ask questions about how to proceed with their suit. This communication is inappropriate. The Court directs Plaintiffs’ counsel to both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Eastern District of California’s Local Rules. Both sets of rules explain how parties should interact with the Court and how to litigate their lawsuit. Both sets of rules are available online. In the future, Plaintiffs’ counsel should consult both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Eastern District’s Local Rules before proceeding. Local Rules 200 – 305 apply to civil cases, like the one at hand. Local Rule 230 specifically deals with civil motions. In the future, Plaintiffs must comply with this rule.
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Editorial concerning the Obama-related activities of Orly Taitz, Esq.

      Let me try to make this real simple.

      IMO, a very large number of ordinary, concerned citizens understand what Orly has been repeatedly saying and trying very hard for about four years to accomplish regarding the dangerous, Kenyan-born, fascist fraud and likely illegal POTUS, Barack Obama.

      The eyes of most of these same citizens tend to glaze over when listening to the complex, learned, legal arguments of those very few really great lawyers (God bless them) who have taken the time out of their busy schedules to get involved in this critical but largely thankless and unprofitable Obama POTUS eligibility issue.

      Also and regrettably, none of these really great lawyers has been any more successful than Orly has been in challenging Obama in court.

      According to the below-linked 6/20/2012 poll results, an astounding 63% of Republicans at that time believed that Obama was born in a foreign country.

      This includes the 55.8% who checked: "I have always believed President Obama was born in another country" and the 8.0% who checked: "I used to think President Obama was born in the United States but I now think he was born in another country." I think the total number of Republicans having this opinion has probably increased even further since the time that poll was taken.

      http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/55-...reign-country/

      I think Orly has done a MAGNIFICENT JOB of bringing the Obama POTUS eligibility and fraud issues to the attention of the American Public. She has RELENTLESSLY pursued this matter on countless occasions and on many diverse venues. She truly understands the danger we are facing.

      I am reminded of the expression, "There is no such thing as bad publicity." and I believe the phenomenon is playing a significant part in this entire Obama challenge.

      http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/t...publicity.html

      When all is said and done and the truth about Obama finally becomes a matter of record, I believe it will be widely acknowledged that PUBLIC CONCERN AND PRESSURE played a major part in ultimately getting justice accomplished.

      THANK YOU ORLY for the very significant part you are playing in this monumental and critically important effort!
      Last edited by bsteadman; 03-22-2013, 02:25 PM.
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X