Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seven Myths About ‘Women in Combat’ -- FrontPage Magazine, G.S. Newbold

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Seven Myths About ‘Women in Combat’ -- FrontPage Magazine, G.S. Newbold

    Seven Myths About ‘Women in Combat’

    FrontPage Magazine

    G.S. Newbold
    3/20/2013

    Reprinted from michaelyon-online.com.

    Excerpt:

    Myth #1 – “It’s about women in combat.”

    No, it’s not. Women are already in combat, and are serving well and professionally. The issue should be more clearly entitled, “Women in the infantry.” And this is a decidedly different proposition.

    Myth #2 – “Combat has changed” (often accompanied by “There are no front lines anymore”).

    This convenient misconception requires several counters. First, any serious study of military history will reveal numerous historical examples about how successive generations (over millennia) believed that warfare had changed forever, only to find that technology may change platforms, but not its harsh essence. To hope that conflicts over the last 20 years are models of a new, antiseptic form of warfare is delusional.

    The second point is that the enemy gets a vote – time, place, and style. For example, war on the Korean Peninsula would be a brutal, costly, no-holds-barred nightmare of mayhem in close combat with casualties in a week that could surpass the annual total of recent conflict.

    The final point on this myth reinforces the Korea example and it bears examination — Fallujah, Iraq in 2004, where warfare was reduced to a horrific, costly, and exhausting scrap in a destroyed city between two foes that fought to the death.

    The standard for ground combat unit composition should be whether social experimentation would have amplified our opportunity for success in that crucible, or diminished it. We gamble with our future security when we set standards for warfare based on the best case, instead of the harshest one.

    Myth #3 – “If they pass the physical standards, why not?”

    Physical standards are important, but not nearly all of the story. Napoleon – “The moral (spirit) is to the physical as three is to one.”

    Unit cohesion is the essence of combat power, and while it may be convenient to dismiss human nature for political expediency, the facts are that sexual dynamics will exist and can affect morale. That may be manageable in other environments, but not in close combat.

    Any study of sexual harassment statistics in this age cohort – in the military, academia, or the civilian workplace — are evidence enough that despite best efforts to by sincere leaders to control the issue, human instincts remain strong. Perceptions of favoritism or harassment will be corrosive, and cohesion will be the victim.

    Myth #4 – “Standards won’t be lowered.”

    This is the cruelest myth of all. The statements of the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are telling.

    They essentially declare “guilty until proven innocent” on anyone attempting to maintain the standards which produced the finest fighting force in the world. There are already accommodations (note that unit cohesion won’t be a metric), there will be many more, and we will pay a bloody price for it someday.

    Pity the truthful leader who attempts to hold to standards based on realistic combat factors, and tells truth to power. Most won’t, and the others won’t survive.

    Myth #5 – “Opening the infantry will provide a better pathway to senior rank for the talented women.”

    Not so. What will happen is that we will take very talented females with unlimited potential and change their peer norm when we inject them into the infantry.

    Those who might meet the infantry physical standard will find that their peers are expected, as leaders, to far exceed it (and most of their subordinates will, as well).

    So instead of advancing to a level appropriate to their potential, they may well be left out.

    ..............................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://frontpagemag.com/2013/g-s-new...men-in-combat/
    B. Steadman
Working...
X