Featured in the adjacent picture is a 28 years of age Kenyan woman (her name is Millicent) and her sons Robert (left) and Ben (right). The boys are holding up their Kenyan birth certificates (government-issued).
Millicent could not financially afford to give birth at a hospital and her boys were delivered at home.
When a baby is born at a hospital in Kenya the mother will receive a tangible notification from the hospital regarding the birth.
Many families in Kenya cannot financially afford to have their children delivered at hospitals and the government is not notified when children are born at home. It appears that these children often go without birth certificates and/or that their parents face significant challenges while attempting to obtaining a certificate for their child.
Read more about Millicent and the obstacles that she and her children faced in 2012 which were reported in the article feature below:
Please exercise your free speech in the comments section below. There are no stipulations of political correctness on this blog. Speak your mind, give us your thoughts, both objective and subjective. Share your ideas, hunches, inklings or your expertise. Please provide recommendation and corrections if you spot errors in fact within the blog report. Lastly, remember that posting a comment is much like casting a vote, so please do so.
This is interesting:
http://hudumakenya.blogspot.com/2015_03_01_archive.html
The Kenyan birth certificates they show look nothing like the one Smith claims he acquired for Obama.
https://newordinary.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/nbirth-certificate.png
The Republic of Kenya birth certificate at the link below has a birth date listed as 09-04-1983, and a registrar’s signature that is dated July 30, 2013. If the birth certificate below is authentic, could it be printed on a 2013 birth certificate form, instead of on a 1983 birth certificate form?
https://newordinary.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/nbirth-certificate.png
>>> THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER BIRTH CERTIFICATES FROM KENYA WHICH
LOOK THE SAME AS THE ONE ON THIS BLOG . <<<
>>> ATTENTION <<<
ON SEPTEMBER 24 , 20154 ,THE SUPREME COURT WILL HEAR THE CASE OF THE CENTURY : CODY ROBERT JUDY vs. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA , TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE FRAUD WHO ILLEGALLY OCCUPIES OUR CAPITOL AND WHITEHOUSE .
QUESTION : WILL THIS MONUMENTAL EVENT BE ATTENDED BY LUCAS SMITH OR BRUCE STEADMAN ? WILL THE AUTHENTIC KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE BE PRESENTED IN EVIDENCE ?
QUESTION : ANOTHER CASE , FILED BY LARRY KLAYMAN , SHERIFF ARPAIO , MIKE ZULLO AND THE COLD CASE POSSE , PRESENTING THE AUTHENTIC KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR OBAMA ,WILL BE HEARD TO ASK WHETHER OBAMA IS ELIGIBLE FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT . ————
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
Carl,
Interesting! You stated ‘certificates’ (plural). Are you referring to a Kenyan BC that is DIFFERENT from the authentic document, which Lucas also obtained and which is identified as:
If so, could you please provide a link or reference to your source for the information.
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
Not quite: Judy filed a lawsuit, which was dismissed as frivolous. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, and it agreed it was frivolous. Judy then filed in SCOTUS, which denied Judy’s motion for in forma pauperis status, and ordered him to pay the filing fee and submit proper briefs or else suffer dismissal. Judy then filed a motion for reconsideration, which is on the September conference. Which is a closed-door event; there is nothing for the public to attend.
At the September conference, SCOTUS will either deny Judy’s reconsideration motion and dismiss his case, or grant his reconsideration motion and deny cert. Either way, this “case of the century” will be over. Just like every other birther suit preceding it.
There is no such case presently pending, and there is no indication that such a case will ever be filed.
But, as the song suggests, don’t stop believing!
>>> BRUCE , I AM IGNORANT , AMATEUR , INCOMPETENT ON A COMPUTER <<<
I DO REMEMBER SEEING OTHER BIRTH CERTIFICATES FROM THE SAME
" COAST PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL " BUT COULD NOT LOCATE IT AND SEND YOU A LINK .
I AM VERY EXCITED ABOUT ATTORNEY LARRY KLAYMAN , et al SCHEDULING A FORMAL HEARING WITH THE SUPREME COURT , AND WONDERED WHETHER YOU OR LUCAS WOULD ATTEND .
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
First, I must apologize. Legal matters, especially those involving SCOTUS, are definitely not my strong suit.
That being said, I have not been able to locate any reference to a ‘scheduled hearing’ or even a (usually-inconsequential) ‘scheduled conference’ by SCOTUS involving either Sheriff Joe Arpaio or Larry Klayman.
For my SCOTUS search results regarding ‘Arpaio’, see: http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=arpaio&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
For my SCOTUS search results regarding ‘Klayman’, see: http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?Search=klayman&type=Supreme-Court=Dockets
The following is the most recent news I could locate regarding Sheriff Arpaio and Attorney Klayman:
U.S. court throws out Arizona sheriff’s immigration policy challenge
Reuters / US
Lawrence Hurley
8/14/2015
Excerpt:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. federal appeals court on Friday threw out a lawsuit brought by an Arizona sheriff who argued that President Barack Obama’s executive actions on immigration were unconstitutional.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a district court judge’s finding that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio did not have grounds to sue.
Arpaio claimed his office had been injured by Obama’s November 2014 orders that were designed to ease the threat of deportation for about 4.7 million undocumented immigrants.
“We are pleased that the D.C. Circuit did not allow Sheriff Arpaio’s lawsuit to stand in the way of commonsense measures to advance public safety and bring greater accountability to our immigration system,” Eric Schultz, a White House spokesman, said.
Arpaio’s lawyer, Larry Klayman, said he would seek Supreme Court review of the ruling. He described the decision as “intellectually dishonest. – (bold emphasis added)
……………………………………..
View the compete article, including images, at:
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0QJ1I920150814
————————————————-
Carl,
If you can provide a source or link regarding the claimed hearing by SCOTUS on the matter, please advise.
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
According my below-linked SCOTUS docket search results, there appears to a ‘Motion DISTRIBUTED for ‘Conference’ of September 28, 2015. (bold emphasis added)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docketfiles/14-9396.htm
However, as I understand the topic, a scheduled ‘SCOTUS Conference’ is a MUCH LOWER HURDLE for a litigant to accomplish than a full ‘SCOTUS Hearing’.
As I recall, SCOTUS often ‘discusses’ a great many (sometimes over 100?) cases in Conference at a single session. Only a very few of these cases are ever scheduled for a full hearing. Unfortunately, I very much doubt that Mr. Judy’s case will be selected for a hearing by SCOTUS any time in the foreseeable future. (Reference: Clarence Thomas on ‘evasion’ of the eligibilty issue – http://www.wnd.com/2010/04/142101/ )
Furthermore, and sadly, I think it is within the realm of possibility that, if our currently compromised (?) SCOTUS ever does choose to hear a POTUS eligibiliy case, they might not rule in accordance with the Constitution drafter’s ‘original intent”, Emmerich de Vattel: “The Law of Nations” or Minor v. Happersett 1875.
Remember, as an example, the recent tragic ruling by SCOTUS on the constitutionality of ‘Obamacare‘! In that ruling, our top judicial branch of government obviously was viewing our Constitution as a ‘living document’, able to be changed as desired by the politicians in office at the time. ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC. If this travesty of justice continues, it will hasten the decent of our former Constitutional Republic into anarchy, followed inevitably by dictatorship!
Kenyan-born Obama is a LIAR, FRAUD and IMPOSTER! – http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/1961%20Kenyan%20Birth%20Certificate%20of%20Barack%20Hussein%20Obama%20II,%20Copy.pdf
GO — FRONT-RUNNING REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, DONALD TRUMP!
GO — MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO AND THE CCP!
>>> CORRECTION <<<
CODY ROBERT JUDY CAS WILL BE HEARD BY 9th DISTRICT COURT .
ATTORNEY LARRY KLAYMAN HAS FILED A LAWSUIT TO HAVE obummer DECLARED AN ILLEGAL ALIEN AND DEPORT HIM .
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
I may have missed something regarding the topic, but according to the following info posted by Cody Robert Judy on his website, there is currently no case involving him scheduled for a hearing at the 9th District Court of Appeals:
Link: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/joe-bidens-wait-real-story-obamas.html
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
I’m not a lawyer (and I don’t even play one on TV) but I believe that Klayman has submitted a PETITION to have Obama deported. I don’t think he has actually filled a formal LAWSUIT regarding the matter.
See the following two articles on the topic dating back to October 2014:
http://dailycaller.com/2014/10/04/here-we-go-again-larry-klayman-just-cant-quit-obama-files-deportation-petition/
I didn’t see any current references to the topic at either of Larry’s websites, Freedom Watch or Judicial Watch:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/category/lawsuit/
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/?s=deport+obama
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
All wrong.
1. Judy is on SCOTUS’ first conference. Once the results of that conference are released, we will all see that Judy’s case is over.
2. Judy has never had a case in 9th Circuit (not “District”).
3. Klayman did not file a lawsuit seeking President Obama’s deportment. Last year, Klayman requested the DHS to deport President Obama, a request that the DHS ignored. (But birthers are impressed by futile gestures.)
SCOTUS denied Judy’s motion for reconsideration.
So much for his case being “heard.”
@ Bruce:
>>> HELLO BRUCE : THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF CONFLICTING INFO ON THE CASE OF CODY ROBERT JUDY , ESPECIALLY REGARDING VENUES AND DATES .
COMES NOW TODAY A NOTICE THAT THE ” STUPID COURT OF AMERICA ” HAS DENIED JUDY A HEARING AND DISMISSED HIS PETITION ( WHICH IS NO SURPRISE ) .
THE INFO WAS SENT BY email FROM MY ADDRESS TO 2 ADDRESSES FOR LUCAS DANIEL SMITH . HOPEFULLY , YOU CAN POST IT HERE . <<<
AMERICAN ADVOCATE wrote:
The following info was reproduced from the Supreme Court publication linked in the 10/5/2015 Comment by ‘bob’ above:
Note that the SCOTUS order does NOT include the judgement word ‘denied’ as it plainly does for those cases where this was a published October 5th judgement.
I just checked the ‘Cody Robert Judy’ blog ( http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/ ) regarding the topic but no updated information regarding the case has yet been posted on that site.
However, I found the following 10/6/2015 post by Mr. Judy on his Facebook site. Note that the Post & Email article cited can currently be viewed by ‘subscription only’
https://www.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016
My conclusion on the topic is – The Supreme Court of the USA is “continuing to evade the issue” regarding the POTUS eligibility of OBAMA, the LIAR, FRAUD and IMPOSTOR.
Apparently they are choosing to leave the matter up to Congress.
The Authentic 1961 Kenyan Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama II
http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/1961%20Kenyan%20Birth%20Certificate%20of%20Barack%20Hussein%20Obama%20II,%20Copy.pdf
>>> BRUCE , THANK YOU FOR POSTING ACCURATE INFORMATION REGARDING THE ” STUPID COURT ” DECISIONS . DOES IT MEAN THAT CODY ROBERT JUDY HAS COME TO THE END OF POSSIBILITIES , OR IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL ? <<<
WE ( ALL OF US ) ARE GRATEFUL FOR YOU , YOUR EFFORTS AND YOUR ABILITIES TO OBTAIN INFORMATION FROM SOURCES WE HAVE NOT .
SALUTE '
Bruce wrote:
SCOTUS did use “denied”; the docket for Judy’s case:
The district court dismissed Judy’s suit as frivolous; the appellate court affirmed that dismissal. There’s no evasion; Judy’s suit was just gibberish.