I was informed this morning when I arrived for a meet with my attorney that a motion hearing has been scheduled by the Court to take place this Wednesday.
It appears that the hearing was set up about two weeks ago but my attorney just found out about it today. Furthermore, my attorney does not know what the motion is in respect to.
I will keep readers updated.
Please exercise your free speech in the comments section below. There are no stipulations of political correctness on this blog. Speak your mind, give us your thoughts, both objective and subjective. Share your ideas, hunches, inklings or your expertise. Please provide recommendation and corrections if you spot errors in fact within the blog report. Lastly, remember that posting a comment is much like casting a vote, so please do so.
I will keep readers updated.
I need some time to forge some documents for Steadman’s benefit.
Must be hell to live in your imaginary mind, Lucas.
You’ve never been to Africa much less Kenya. Time to stop playing the games. Come back to the states where you’re actually wanted, turn yourself in and do what ever time they give you.
Soy bacon is more believable than you, Smith.
@ Andrew Vrba, PmG:
You Andy, commenting on believability! You the racist that masks your persona as an anti birther obot. Believable is definitely not you.
Motion Hearing Law & Legal Definition
USLEGAL.COM
View the complete post at:
http://definitions.uslegal.com/m/motion-hearing/
Hearing on a motion is Motion Hearing. A Motion is a request asking a judge to issue a ruling or order on a legal matter. Usually, one side files a motion, along with notice of the motion to the attorney for the opposing party, the other side files a written response. Once a judge receives a motion, he or she can grant or deny the motion based on its contents. In the alternative, the judge can also schedule a hearing. At a motion hearing, each party can argue its position and the judge can ask specific questions about the fact or law. After hearing the judge decides the motion and this is called an order. However, during a trial or a hearing, an oral motion may also be permitted.
Motions are often made before trials to resolve procedural and preliminary issues, and may be made after trials to enforce or modify judgments.
Motions are made in court all the time for many purposes such as to continue a trial to a later date, to get a modification of an order, for temporary child support, for a judgment, for dismissal of the opposing party’s case, for a rehearing, for sanctions, and many other reasons. A motion on a factual matter usually will be filed with a supporting affidavit.For example, a motion for leave is a request for permission to do something, such as filing a supplemental or amended pleading.
A motion hearing provides judges with an opportunity to hear oral arguments, in addition to the written motion and memoranda submitted to the court. Local rules of court may provide specific standards or procedures with respect to setting hearings on motions.
……………………….
This is Sione Puletau i am Secret Service Serving President Barrack and the First Lady Michelle Obama (First Family) of United States of America the King Siaosi Tupou 6 and the First Lady Queen Nanasipauu Tukuaho (Royal Family) of Tonga and I am a Member of Obama Care Working a Secretary,Government Specialist,Premiere Assistance for the Kingdom of Tonga.The Obama Care would liked to Donate this for the Kenya Government $5000000 from Commonwealth Fund to the Government
@ Bruce:
Bruce, quit quoting irrelevant legal stuff and send money to Lucas. Now! Don’t let it worry your pretty little head that Lucas didn’t name the attorney, the judge, the court, or provide one shred of evidence that this hearing is actually happening. For god’s sake send money Bruce.
Does anyone know where I can donate to Kenya to assist their extradition efforts? I want them to have the best chance possible to succeed in putting the little weasel in jail for years to come. I consider it my patriotic duty to support the cause.
Just a quick, I attended the extradition hearing. I am still free but will probably not be able to post reports here at WOBIK until Sunday (although its possible that I may be able to before that).
Lucas Daniel Smith wrote:
That’s great news, at least for now.
I was concerned that the DR officials might have decided to have you conveniently whisked out of the country when you showed up for the hearing on May 21st, and then just quietly pocketed the ‘cash consideration’, which likely was promised by the Kenyan officials, for getting the job accomplished.
Watch Live: Sheriff Joe Or Mike Zullo On Air Today; BREAKING OBAMA INVESTIGATION INFO
Birther Report
5/23/2014
Excerpt:
SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO or either MIKE ZULLO will be on Freedom Friday today with the LATEST info and update on the investigation and upcoming conferences. There will be some BREAKING info today – TUNE IN!
Freedom Friday with Carl Gallups and Brandon Big B
5-7 PM ET.
LISTEN LIVE on 1330 WEBY – Gulf Coast Talk Radio or at carlgallups.com. WATCH LIVE on Ustream at carlgallups.com.
Don’t MISS THIS SHOW! See Ya There! – PPSimmons Facebook. Hat tip Guest.
LIVE AUDIO STREAM:
[[[ CLICK …]]]
LIVE VIDEO STREAM:
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/05/watch-live-sheriff-joe-or-mike-zullo.html
MARTHA STEWART – CONVICTED FELON
In 2004, Stewart was convicted of charges related to the ImClone insider trading affair and there was speculation that the incident would effectively end her media empire. She began a comeback campaign in 2005 and her company returned to profitability in 2006. Stewart rejoined the board of directors of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia in 2011 and became chairman of her namesake company again in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Stewart
———————————————
Excerpt from CNBC:
Founder, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
Born: Aug. 3, 1941, Jersey City, N.J.
Education: Bachelor’s in history and architectural history, Barnard College
Martha Stewart is not the richest person on our list of the 25 most transformative icons, rebels and leaders of the past quarter-century. She has not created the most wealth or employment for others. Nor does she have the greatest global reach. But she embodies many of the defining innovative characteristics of U.S. business in the past 25 years: reinvention, the second act, the personality-based brand and the explosive post-1980s growth of homemaking as a media and retailing category. In an era of tumultuous technological and economic change, Stewart has built a powerfully appealing American brand around idyllically well-organized, simple and tasteful domestic life.
View the complete article at:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/101576706
Image Credit: http://blogs.emulex.com/labs/files/2013/04/Martha-Stewart-Jail.jpg