LA Times – Question Ted Cruz should ask: Can a foreign-born American be president? (by Doyle McManus, Feb. 24, 2015)

3 Responses to LA Times – Question Ted Cruz should ask: Can a foreign-born American be president? (by Doyle McManus, Feb. 24, 2015)

1. Mark McDaniel says:

   February 25, 2015 at 5:18 pm

   Dear Lucas, please don’t forget you promised me that I could borrow your birth certificate and present it before Congress—I know something about that document and I will give that info to them. Obama is a CIA agent with a whole bunch of fake papers, your birth certificate is one of them, planted there by CIA, which makes it an “authentic-fake,” if you know what I mean—he also has a bunch of fake social security numbers, as well. This is what Congress is trying to cover up—that Obama is CIA with fake docs. They got busted because Valerie Jarrett forgot to “flatten” the document before she hit the upload button
2. Lucas Daniel Smith says:

   February 25, 2015 at 6:07 pm

   @ Mark McDaniel:

   Yes. That would be great, and thank you.

   Also, can you post anymore regarding Valerie Jarrett and her connection with the Obamas?

   I don’t know whole lot about Valerie Jarrett but I did read the following (regarding her longtime relationship with the Obamas) at Wikipedia:

   
3. Lucas Daniel Smith says:

   February 25, 2015 at 6:18 pm

   Here’s an interesting report on Valerie Jarrett (born in Iran) and her family background:

   VALERIE JARRETT, CHICAGO, AND THE IRAN DEAL

   Breitbart News
   by JOEL B. POLLAK
   Nov. 26, 2013

   Excerpt:

   Almost anything “personally overseen” by the President Obama is likely to bear the heavy stamp of Ms. Jarrett, who is the president’s closest adviser, despite a shocking track record of failure. In foreign policy, her most important mistake was her effort to dissuade the president from proceeding with the raid on Osama bin Laden. It was one of the few times that President Obama overruled her counsel–and one of his few successes.

   Jarrett’s involvement in Iran is cause for concern for three additional reasons–two minor and one major. One minor reason is that she was born there. That should not automatically disqualify anyone, of course, any more than being born in the Soviet Union would have disqualified an anti-Soviet dissident. But Jarrett was born in 1956 to American expatriates in the aftermath of the CIA-assisted coup that deposed Mohammad Mossadegh.

   …

   The second minor reason to worry about Jarrett’s involvement in Iran is her political background. Her entrée into the world of left-wing politics in Chicago was through her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, a journalist with somewhat radical views. Jarrett spoke out against antisemitism in the black community, for example, but also took anti-Israel stands, accusing pro-Israel Jews of “support of genocide” in the Lebanon War, for example.

   These two reasons for concern are fairly minor, because they are based on mere speculation, and would have to be balanced out by other factors, such as Ms. Jarrett’s personal associations with leaders of the pro-Israel community in Chicago. But the major reason for concern about her role is simply that Jarrett has banished, and repulsed, most of the Obama administration’s most competent appointees from the White House.

   …

   Finally, it is worth noting that Jarrett, despite her expatriate origins, has little experience in international affairs, and is said to manage Obama’s policies through a domestic political lens. If she was as involved in the talks as reports suggest, that could be a major reason for the president’s eagerness to sign almost any deal, even one the French rejected as too weak. In any other administration, she likely would have been ignored.

   Read more at:

   http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2013/11/26/valerie-jarrett-chicago-and-the-iran-deal/