Barack Obama failed to appear for eligibility hearing (01.26.2011) in Georgia. Judge Michael Malihi to make ruling after parties file briefs in February.

14 Responses to Barack Obama failed to appear for eligibility hearing (01.26.2011) in Georgia. Judge Michael Malihi to make ruling after parties file briefs in February.

1. Mike says:

   January 28, 2012 at 8:03 pm

   DO NOT CENSOR THIS POSTING!!! THANKS!! THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS POST THAT WOULD JUSTIFY CENSORING IT!!

   The issue is quite simple. To be President of the USA or to run for the Presidency of the USA, Obama must be a “natural born citizen” according to the Constitution of the USA. The term “natural born citizen” has been defined previously and it requires two conditions:
   1) Obama must be born in the USA.
   Obama’s long form birth certificate that Obama has provided through the White House web site HAS BEEN DECLARED BY MANY EXPERTS TO BE SIMPLY A FORGERY!!!
   —See evidence that Obama forged the birth certificate that was posted on the White House servers on 27 April 2011 (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684
   —See evidence that Obama is using a Social Security Number (SSN) 042-68-4425 that was not legally issued to him but to someone else (!!) at http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742
   —Just type the keywords Obama birth certificate forgery in http://www.google.com and you will find many articles that thoroughly explain why Obama’s long form birth certificate is simply a forgery!!!
   —Therefore, the only way to check this long form birth certificate is to go to Hawaii to check it directly. In particular, it is indispensable to assess if even this original long form birth certificate in Hawaii is truly genuine that is if it is not also a forgery to cover up for the possible fact that Obama might never have been born in Hawaii!!
   2) Obama’s parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
   We know that Obama’s father was a Kenyan and that he NEVER was an American citizen!!!!!
   Therefore, THIS SECOND CONDITION ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA AND IT ALSO DISQUALIFIES OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, NO MATTER THE FACT THAT HE WON THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION!!!!!!

   More, Obama is a former lawyer. Therefore, he knew perfectly well that he was not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA but he nevertheless did it DISHONESTLY, FRAUDULENTLY, deceiving purposefully the entire American people.

   Furthermore, Obama was confronted with the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is when he directly participated in the investigation of John McCain’s eligibility to run for the Presidency of the USA. Obama then signed Senate Resolution 511 from April 30, 2008 that reveals the indispensable requirement of having two US citizen parents in order to be a “natural born citizen” according to the Constitution of the USA and therefore to be eligible to run for the Presidency of the USA or to be President of the USA!!!!!
   Therefore, once again, Obama knew very well that he FRAUDULENTLY decided to run for the Presidency of the USA despite the fact that he knew perfectly well that he was NOT a natural born citizen and therefore that he was not entitled, according to the Constitution of the USA, to be President of the USA.

   First Conclusion:
   —Obama is NOT a natural born citizen and therefore he is not entitled to run for the Presidency of the USA nor is he entitled to be President of the USA, no matter the fact that he won the Presidential election!!!!
   —Finally, Obama is a former lawyer and therefore OBAMA CONSCIOUSLY, INTENTIONALLY COMPLETELY DECEIVED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA WHEN HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT ENTITLED TO DO SO SIMPLY BECAUSE HE KNEW VERY WELL THAT HE WAS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, AS THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA REQUIRES ONLY ON THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!!!!
   —THIS HUGE DECEPTION IS MORE THAN A FRAUDULENT ACT, IT IS WORSE THAN ANYTHING IMAGINABLE BECAUSE:
   1) IT RELATES TO THE HIGHEST POSITION IN THE LAND, THE PRESIDENCY OF THE USA, THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED;
   2) IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA BEING TRAMPLED UPON FRAUDULENTLY AND ILLEGALLY BY OBAMA;
   3) IT RELATES TO THE FACT THAT OBAMA INTENTIONALLY DECEIVED AND MISLED THE ENTIRE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
   ANY PERSON GUILTY OF SUCH SERIOUS FRAUD SHOULD AT LEAST GET A JAIL SENTENCE, NO MATTER THAT OBAMA HAS FRAUDULENTLY HELD THE POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA FOR A PERIOD OF TIME!!!

   If you really want to have an expert legal explanation on what a “natural born citizen” truly is according to the Constitution of the USA and why legally speaking it is this way, then I suggest that you read at least a few articles on Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s web site “Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers” at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
   In particular, read:
   —“The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth” at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html

   Second conclusion:
   —If you are a rational person, no matter your political affiliation, you surely will be forced to conclude that the facts speak for themselves and that there is no doubt legally that a “natural born citizen” indeed requires that the President of the USA has to have two parents that were BOTH American citizens at the time of Obama’s birth.
   —The Constitution of the USA is sacred to any American citizen AND it applies to every single American citizen, no matter one’s political affiliation, no matter one’s color of the skin, no matter what!!!!
   Therefore, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF LAW LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!) AND IN PARTICULAR OBAMA IS UNDER THE RULE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA LIKE ANYBODY ELSE (NOT ABOVE IT!!!)!!!!
   —You now have the facts fully on the table concerning what a “natural born citizen” truly is, you cannot evade the truth about these facts!!!
   Now, what path are you going to choose?
   1) Keep Lying and hiding the facts, hoping that they will disappear by themselves!! Or
   2) Choose to acknowledge these facts fully and be determined to fight for the truth?
   The choice is yours! But the Constitution of the USA is at stake!!!
2. Bruce says:

   January 28, 2012 at 9:19 pm

   The following is what I believe to be a pertinent and important statement concerning the January 26th Atlanta, GA hearing, which appeared in a 1/27/2012 article on American Thinker titled, “Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks On By”, by Cindy Simpson and Alan P. Halbert.

   The below quoted statement was made by Mr. Halbert:

   “However, what I find most baffling was the decision of Obama and his Attorney choosing to be absent from the proceedings. However, Judge Malihi conducted the hearing in a manner of decorum and was an honest presentation of the facts. Though was hard to guard against the bias of the parties without Obama and his Council being present.

   Many people who are unfamiliar with the Legal System do not know that the hearing or trial level is known as the “trier of the facts”. Only matters of Law can be appealed, not the facts that are developed, presented or testified to in any hearing or trial. Only when there is overwhelming evidence of malfeasance, gross perjury or the denial of the admissibility of probative evidence is a new trial or hearing ordered when a mistake of law has been found on appeal. As a practical matter appellate courts rarely order such remedy, when ordered it is believed that the defendant did not have his constitutional right to face his accusers at the trier of the facts level!

   Since Obama and his attorney chose not to be present a defense and dispute the evidence that was presented, this can be taken as an admission that all of the evidence admitted were indeed facts and may not be disputed at a later time on appeal! The irony of this course is that Obama is declaring that the court has no Jurisdiction in this matter and will appeal as a matter of law though these damning facts may very well stand! It also gives the impression that he considers himself above the law — Georgia’s. We have a plethora of data points on the sequestering of all of Obama’s records and bona fides which he has spent millions of dollars to keep out the public’s hands for the last four years. After this hearing we may eventually know why.”

   The complete article can be viewed at:

   http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/georgia_ballot_challenge_obama_walks_on_by.html
3. ARNOLD CARL TAPP says:

   January 29, 2012 at 3:11 am

   STEADY MAN , IT IS GOOD TO SEE SOME COMMENT FROM YOU . WE HAVE MISSED YOUR INPUT . DO YOU POST IN OTHER LOCATIONS ALSO ?
   I WILL ASK LUCAS TO FORWARD A MESSAGE TO YOU SO THAT YOU CAN HAVE ALL THE SAME SOURCES AS MAKAHAYAN .
4. Bruce says:

   January 29, 2012 at 1:41 pm

   @ ARNOLD CARL TAPP:

   Thanks for the kind words!

   I am privileged to be able to post here and also on Lucas’ InspectorSmith Forum.

   The news from the January 26th hearing in Atlanta, GA was very encouraging to our BHO-II eligibility challenge, and I look forward to Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s ‘Cold Case Posse’ report in February to add to the momentum.

   The 1875 MvH legal approach taken by lawyers Van Irion and Mark Hatfield at the hearing is valid and important. However, I consider their ‘Limited-NBC Approach’ a risky oversimplification of this very complex matter. It can NOT be relied upon to have Obama declared POTUS ineligible and thus allow the possibility of having his many dangerous law-signings and appointments declared ‘null and void’!

   ‘Birth in the USA” is the second and critically important part of the NBC requirement for Obama. I believe Orly Taitz’s efforts at the hearing to prove that his Hawaiian BC was fraudulent was especially important because, unlike his SSN fraud issue, which she also successfully argued, unless Obama can prove he was born in the USA, he can be declared POTUS ineligible!

   — and if he wasn’t born in Hawaii, where in Hell was he born?

   I hope THAT QUESTION will soon be a part of our MSM news! Thankfully, Lucas has already provided the ANSWER in the form of a readily down-loadable, simple, single-page, authentic document, that reveals the truth about Obama’s actual birthplace.

   Importantly, unlike the ‘Limited-NBC Approach’ the ‘Not Born in the USA Approach’ can be easily UNDERSTOOD and ACCEPTED by the vast majority of the American People!

   I am expanding upon and exploring some of the implications contained in the above statements in a thread now running on the InspectorSmith Forum titled, “The Most Important Political Discussion of 2012 Will be Conducted Here on InspectorSmith”

   Use the CPGH-BC as a powerful, supremely incriminating tool to RATCHET UP THE PRESSURE ON THE KENYAN USURPER!
5. ARNOLD CARL TAPP says:

   January 29, 2012 at 6:27 pm

   HELLO BRUCE , AND THANK YOU FOR THE REPLY. YOU ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION IN THE SAME SENTENCE . obummer IS FROM HELL AND SHOULD
   GO BACK THERE .

   PLEASE TELL ME HOW TO ACCESS INSPECTOR SMITH FORUM .
   CARL TAPP
6. Bruce says:

   January 29, 2012 at 7:53 pm

   @ ARNOLD CARL TAPP:

   The InspectorSmith Forum can be easily accessed at:

   http://WasObamaBornInKenya.com/InspectorSmith

   From this blog site, the fastest way to access the forum is by hitting the ‘InspectorSmith Forum’ button on the right hand side of the top toolbar.
7. GreatKim says:

   January 29, 2012 at 9:22 pm

   over excitement. Better be patient, there is nothing you can do now, you guys are in for a big surprise.
8. GreatKim says:

   January 29, 2012 at 9:26 pm

   as I understand Orly filed both the COLB and LFBC in order to show his father wasn’t a US citizen. She has infact admitted both of these documents to be authentic. She is following the “two citizens parents theory”. She will loose big. Feel free to insult and deliver harsh replies. Remember me when the judge has spoken.
9. ARNOLD CARL TAPP says:

   January 30, 2012 at 3:59 am

   @ GreatKim:
   WHAT THE HELL IS YOUR POSITION ~ CHIEF obot ??????????????????????????
   THE JUDGE HAS ALREADY RULED WHEN HE GRANTED A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT AGAINST obozo , AND THE GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE HAS HONORED JUDGE MALIHI ‘ S SUGGESTION THAT THE ” NON CITIZEN ” WILL NOT HAVE HIS NAME ON ANY GEORGIA BALLOT . ORLY TAITZ WAS A MINOR PLAYER IN THIS CASE , AND MARK HATFIELD & VAN IRION SAID THAT SHE WAS ” AS USUAL AN EMBARASSMENT “. WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A SURPRISE WHEN 5 OR 6 OTHER STATES KICK THE BUM OFF THEIR BALLOTS.
10. Great Kim says:

    January 30, 2012 at 10:26 am

    @ ARNOLD CARL TAPP:
    the decision is for Feb 2nd. see next Lucas article. Don’t get mad- Just a few days of patience. Stay well
11. GreatKim says:

    February 3, 2012 at 10:21 pm

    decision taken

    Obama born is USA, therefore NBC, therefore eligible
    
12. ARNOLD CARL TAPP says:

    February 4, 2012 at 1:54 am

    @ GreatKim:
    ANY DAMN FOOL KNOWS THAT BEING BORN IN AMERICA DOES NOT MEAN THE PERSON IS A ‘ NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ‘. BY HIS OWN ADMISSION , obozo
    PROVES THAT HIS FATHER WAS A KENYAN , AND THAT DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM BEING ‘ NATURAL BORN ‘. THERE ARE 4 ( FOUR ) COURT DECISIONS WHICH SET PRECEDENT THAT THERE MUST BE 2 ( TWO ) PARENTS WHO ARE CITIZENS . WE ARE CONSTANTLY IN TOUCH WITH ATTORNEY VAN IRION OF LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION , AND HE SAYS THE THERE WILL BE A APPEAL OF THIS ERRONEOUS DECISION BY A TRAITOROUS ” CANDY ASS ” JUDGE .
13. Greatkim says:

    February 4, 2012 at 9:47 am

    ARNOLD CARL TAPP wrote:

    @ GreatKim:
    ANY DAMN FOOL KNOWS THAT BEING BORN IN AMERICA DOES NOT MEAN THE PERSON IS A ‘ NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ‘. BY HIS OWN ADMISSION , obozo
    PROVES THAT HIS FATHER WAS A KENYAN , AND THAT DISQUALIFIES HIM FROM BEING ‘ NATURAL BORN ‘.

    and that is were you get it wrong. The two parents clause is nonsense, what counts is birth, at birth you are “naturally ” granted citizenship- Just think about a hypothetical case of a child being born to a single mother. There are no provisions to reveal the father’s name in a birth certificate.
    That said we can agree or disagree with the way our country grants citizenship. But changing the status quo would require a constitutional amendment reversing the founding principle of ius soli. We were, and still are, a nation of immigrants, as a new country we ENCOURAGED immigration and citizenship was considered an attractive offer. Times have changed and you have all the rights to demand new requirements for citizenship. But I suggest you do it the right way demanding amendment.
    Orly Taitz is hugely incompetent and she is doing much harm to your cause which would deserve a more serious approach.
    Off course then Obama would certainly not qualify were he born in Kenya. So why don’t you start from there ? Why don’t you challenge his eligibility on the basis of Lucas’document ? The Georgia challengers brought evidence to his birth in Hawaii
    and behaved like mice seeing the cheese and not the trap. You can’t count upon an “array” of disqualifying options because the are contradictory.
    So please, do the right thing, bring Lucas’ Kenyan certificate to court.
14. ARNOLD CARL TAPP says:

    February 4, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    @ Greatkim:
    YOUR OPINION IS LIKE YOUR ASSHOLE~ BOTH SHOULD BE KEPT TO YOURSELF
    HAVE YOU BEEN HIDING UNDER A ROCK FOR THESE THREE YEARS WHILE THIS DISCUSSION WAS ACTIVE ????????????? EVERYONE ELSE HERE KNOWS THAT THERE ARE 4 ( FOUR ) COURT CASES WHICH SET PRECEDENT , PROVING THAT A ‘ NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ‘ IS A PERSON BORN ON AMERICAN SOIL OF 2 ( TWO ) AMERICAN CITIZENS .
    THE ATTORNEYS ~ MARK HATFIELD AND VAN IRION WILL FILE APPEALS
    OF MALIHI’S DECISION. WE CAN FORGET ABOUT TAITZ , SINCE SHE JUST INTERFERES WITH PROGRESS .