Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was the Serial Number on Obama's BC stolen from another 1961 Hawaiian born baby?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Was the Serial Number on Obama's BC stolen from another 1961 Hawaiian born baby?

    Back in early 2012 it seemed likely that the Serial Number used on Barack Obama's Hawaiian fraudulent birth certificate was stolen from a baby girl named Virginia Sunahara, as indicated in this post.

    She was born in Hawaii 8/4/1961, the same date that Obama was born in Kenya, but she died one day later due to neonatal birth complications.

    However, as can be seen in the 1st REPLY to this post, it is now believed, by at least one highly respected researcher, there were likely MORE THAN ONE THEFT of baby's BC Serial Numbers by the Hawaiian Department of Health in their fraudulent process of ultimately assigning a stolen Serial Number to Obama!

    VERY COMPLICATED!


    Excerpt from:

    Update on Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara's Brother

    Birther Report

    1/5/2012

    View the complete Birther Report presentation at:



    WAS BABY VIRGINIA SUNAHARA'S IDENTITY STOLEN?
    Dean C. Haskins


    As was previously reported, in October and November, we spent a total of 2 ½ weeks in Hawaii on an investigative assignment. It was at the beginning of that stay that we met Duncan Sunahara, a highly informed, but unassuming guy, complete with his signature coconut palm frond hat. He was a military veteran with an obvious deep love for his country.

    Early last year, Duncan had become aware of some possible issues surrounding his late sister Virginia's birth certificate, and had spent quite a bit of time on his own trying to get his questions answered. As he related to us, it seemed he was getting nothing but a "run around" from the Department of Health, and the area hospitals. Oddly, it had been reported in 2010 that DOH Director, Loretta Fuddy, had claimed that no records existed for Virginia Sunahara.

    Duncan knew that his sister was born in the same hospital that he had been a few years earlier, and that she was transferred to another hospital, but he didn't know which one (and his elderly mother could not remember). He had visited the birth hospital, Wahiawa General, and both Queen's and Kapi'olani Medical Centers, but was not able to obtain any information from them. We were able to help him procure all of the medical records from the day Virginia spent in Wahiawa General, and found that she was transferred to Kapi'olani, but Kapi'olani insists they have no records on file. It does seem odd that Wahiawa would have the records, but Kapi'olani supposedly does not (how much room could it take to store a roll of microfilm?). This certainly seems "convenient" for them.

    When we visited the Department of Health, we weren't quite sure what we would find, since Loretta Fuddy had insisted that Virginia's records didn't exist. However, we were pleasantly surprised that Duncan's application produced several certified copies of Hawaii's new short form birth certificate (which they now absurdly call their "long form"). Upon closer inspection, we learned that the number assigned to Virginia's birth certificate is 151-1961-011080, and realized that, statistically, that number simply cannot be legitimate.

    Now, here's what's wrong with that number: we all know that the last group of numbers on the "certificate" Barack Obama claims is his official record is 10641, and his certificate was supposedly processed on August 8, 1961. We also know that the Nordyke twins were assigned the numbers 10637 and 10638, and their certificates were processed on August 11, 1961. Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate states that it was processed on August 10, 1961, but the number it was assigned is 443 higher than the Nordyke twin whose certificate was stamped with the number 10637.

    We know that there were 17,616 births in Hawaii in 1961, which shows a statistical average of 48 births per day. To arrive at the number now assigned to Virginia's birth certificate, nine to ten days would have had to have lapsed after the Nordyke twins' certificates were processed, but Virginia's processing date was the day BEFORE the Nordyke's.

    To refute the ridiculous argument that birth certificate worksheets were pre-numbered, and clerks kept small stacks of them on their desks for processing, that is not only patently false, but also, by federal law, would be illegal. Birth certificate "worksheets" (what they call blank birth certificate forms) are kept at the hospitals, and it is there where the information is entered onto them. Once all the information has been entered, they are sent to the DOH, where they are processed using a Bates machine, which enters certificate numbers sequentially, and then the date of processing is stamped onto them. Basement bloggers who suggest otherwise simply prove their lack of factual knowledge with that argument (as if any further proof of that were needed).

    We went back to the DOH the next day to try to obtain a photocopy of Virginia's original birth certificate, but were told that Duncan was not allowed to receive that (according to DOH rules). When we pointed out to Supervisor Jesse Koike that their "rules" were illegal, according to Hawaiian statutes, he told us that Duncan would have to discuss that with Dr. Alvin Onaka. We spent four hours waiting to speak with Onaka, who eventually instructed the security guard to throw us out of the facility (which seems to be outrageous behavior from someone with nothing to hide). Duncan also made several phone calls trying to make an appointment to see Onaka, but could not get him even to return his calls.

    We then sent a certified letter to Onaka requesting the photocopy, and also included the relevant statutory information, and were informed in writing that we would have to take the matter up with Hawaii's Attorney General, which we did. The response we received from the AG contained the same deceptive misinterpretation of the statute, so, as a final step toward filing a complaint with the court, Duncan sent a letter asking for an estimate of how much it would cost for the DOH to perform the necessary research to copy, and send, Virginia's original birth certificate. No response was ever received from the DOH.

    Having attempted every administrative procedure to obtain that to which Duncan is statutorily entitled, a lawsuit was filed on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.

    Here is a video interview of Duncan Sunahara.


    Video: Duncan Sunahara Interview 10-31-2011.wmv

    Last edited by bsteadman; 02-25-2013, 05:21 PM.
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Clue #2: Obama Apparently Given Stig Waidelich’s BC#

    Butterdezillion's Blog

    Butterdezillion
    3/24/2013

    Excerpt:

    Clue Number Two

    Clue #2: Four of the August 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has disclosed were changed BY THE HDOH from their original 1961 owners – the 3 records with the red flags, and the short-form BC of Stig Waidelich.

    SUMMARY: Stig Waidelich’s computer-generated COLB has a BC# that requires a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period. It is obviously falsified. So not only do we have paper records (1960-64 birth index, the Ah Nee and Obama BC’s, and the Sunahara death certificate) being falsified by the HDOH, but we have the BC# in the computer system itself being falsified. And all these falsified certificates claimed BC#’s that could not have been on those BC’s in 1961. Stig Waidelich is almost certainly the original owner of the BC# that the HDOH has verified as currently belonging to Obama.

    In the next installment we will look at the only circumstance in which a new BC# can lawfully be assigned to a person. That will be the key that opens the door on what the HDOH has done, when, and why. Everything we’ve seen makes sense when we realize how the HDOH could legally try to justify giving Obama the BC# that belonged to Stig Waidelich.


    View the complete post at:

    http://butterdezillion.files.wordpre...number-two.pdf
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Part Three: The Law Enforcement Provision

      Butterdezillion's Blog

      Butterdezillion
      3/28/2013

      Excerpt:

      Summary: The alteration of 4 out of the 6 disclosed August 1961 BC#’s (including one deceased infant) makes it almost certain that the HDOH shifted BC#’s in order to give Obama a new BC# on a BC created at the request of law enforcement and claiming whatever law enforcement said it should say. There is a BC in Hawaii that has the BC# 10641 and whatever law enforcement ordered it to say, for Obama’s safety. There is also the record that Obama originally had, which has a different BC# and reveals something so drastically different that law enforcement claimed that real record would put Obama’s life at risk.

      Either that, or the HDOH falsified at least 4 August 1961 BC#’s without even trying to legally justify it.
      - (underline emphasis added)

      View the complete post at:

      http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com...ent-provision/
      B. Steadman

      Comment


      • #4
        Evidence Drop: Hawaii DOH Apparently Gave Obama Stig Waidelich's Birth Certificate Number

        Birther Report

        4/2/2013

        View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

        http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...te-number.html
        B. Steadman

        Comment

        Working...
        X