Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lawsuit Filed v HI DOH on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara's Brother -- Free Republic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lawsuit Filed v HI DOH on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara's Brother -- Free Republic

    New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)

    Free Republic

    References a recent article on Birther Report
    Thread started 1/4/2012 by 'Red Steel'

    Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara

    "Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates."

    View the Free Republic thread at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2828807/posts

    ----------------------------------------
    Excerpt from COMMENT #11 by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

    "This is confusing to me because Orly got a copy of the COLB. This must be a suit to get a copy of the long-form from the microfilm or original. Orly has a subpoena for that already, doesn’t she? They’d have a hard time giving a reason for a brother to not be able to get the record for his deceased sister.

    Of course, the HDOH anticipated that this would happen so they trampled all over UIPA and HRS 338-16 by claiming that they would issue only computer-generated “copies” rather than photocopies. Computer-generated things can be easily manipulated.

    If the suit was filed in the name of Clara - Virginia’s mother - UIPA would require that the HDOH release a photocopy, because Clara’s name is listed on the document in question, and UIPA REQUIRES agencies to disclose records having the requestor’s name on it. I wonder if they can add Clara’s name to the lawsuit. That would change everything from a legal standpoint because it would make the disclosure mandated by UIPA, rather than allowing the wiggle-room of HRS 338-16 (where it gives the HDOH Director discretion to decide what form of reproduction will be used for the “copy”, although actually the requestor has the option of requesting a copy of the document or a copy of the CONTENTS of the document. A computer printout is a copy of the CONTENTS but NOT a copy of the document. If a copy of the document is requested that is what the HDOH is required to give, according to HRS 338-16. But, as somebody mentioned and as we all nauseatingly know already, Hawaii doesn’t need to follow no stinking laws or rules.)"


    -----------------------------------------------

    COMMENT #48 by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

    "There’s no original birth certificate for Obama. The original birth certificate for Sunahara is probably the base document for Obama’s forgery, if the analysis I’ve seen is correct. Here’s a comment from a commenter on my blog that summarizes it well:

    “Unfortunately for Obama, Sunahara was not born at the same HOSPITAL as Obama wants people to think he was born. She was born at Wahiawa Hospital. And Obama’s long-form has the signature of the same local registrar who signed Edith Coats’ BC after her birth at Wahiawa Hospital. Based on excellent analysis in print at

    http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/55594183

    or on video at
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&f...&v=haiRCLItdEQ ,

    the two fields that don’t have the proper distortion on the curved left-hand side are the gender and the hospital name.So apparently the gender had to be changed to “male” and the hospital to “Kapiolani” – which means that one of the genuine documents that was used for the forgery actually belonged to a female not born at Kapiolani – and the local registrar was the one we know registered at least one birth from Wahiawa Hospital. Judging by the gray-scale letters that indicate they were from the original source document,the girl whose record was used had an R for the third letter of her first name. Virginia fits all these requirements: female, born at Wahiawa Hospital, and having an R as the 3rd letter of her first name.”
    Last edited by bsteadman; 01-05-2012, 06:39 PM.
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Hawaii Act to Regulate Names, Christian Name Law in Effect in 1961, Name 'Barack'-???

    Hawaii Act to Regulate Names

    COMMENT #104 in the Free Repubic Thread by 'bushpilot1'


    Excerpt:

    "We located Hawaii had a Christian name law since the 19th century.

    This law was valid in 1961. All children born in Hawaii must have a Christian name.

    Some say Barack is not a Christian name. Some say the law was not really maintained.

    Duncan is another example the name law was enforced."
    (caps emphasis added)


    COMMENT #119 in the Free Republic Thread by 'bushpilot1'

    To: butterdezillion

    Act to Regulate Names

    Link referenced below:

    http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=...=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v

    The Free Republic thread is linked below:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-...?q=1&;page=101
    Last edited by bsteadman; 01-07-2012, 06:26 PM.
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Analysis of Serial Number Sequence on Obama's Birth Certificate, Fred Nerks, FR

      Analysis and comments by Fred Nerks concerning the serial number sequence problems with Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate

      COMMENT #135 by Fred Nerks in the Free Republic thread

      http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011...equential.html

      Read this paragraph carefully, and each time you see the name ‘Obama’ substitute the name ‘Virginia’ and it should become clear why both baby COATS and Virginia’s birth certificates show the name of the same local registrar. Because they were both born in the same hospital.
      Where is Virginia’s birth certificate, you may ask. I think you are looking at it. It’s numbered 10641.

      I will substitute the names here now, as an experiment:

      “Therefore, the Nordyke’s Kapi’olani generated birth certificates were signed on August 11th by the registrar, three days later than Obama’s VIRGINIA’S registration, because the Nordyke’s certificates were two of more than 100 which occurred in that registration office during that week. Obama’s VIRGINIA’S was signed on August 8th and recorded three days earlier because his VIRGINIA’S Certificate was merely one of four registration records occurring in that local office. The process moved faster for Obama’s VIRGINIA’S registration because there were fewer certificates for that local registrar to process than the quantity of registrations processed in the office used by the city’s main hospital where the Nordyke’s registered. This occurred because of the 50-percent sampling and geographic number order process required by the U.S. Department and its effect on Obama’s VIRGINIA’S “externally” registered birth in another registration office not used by the hospital.”

      So while the analysis attemps to tell us that the reason the numbers are out of sequence is due to zero having been born in another hospital in Hawaii, in fact, what the analysis shows is that Virginia was born in the same hospital as baby COATS, a matter which DUNCAN SUNAHARA has now confirmed in the video, in which he clearly names the hospital.

      http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/7...ertcoats7c.jpg

      WAHIAWA GENERAL HOSPITAL. And the name of the LOCAL REGISTRAR is the same on both."
      The Free Republic thread is linked below:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-...?q=1&;page=101
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X